I figure my rendering skills are always improving, so I hang onto the RAWs. Just the other day I wanted to print a picture of my dog who had passed away. I went back to a 2004 shot I had produced with the *istD. I looked at the tiff and felt that it left something to be desired. Went back and did a new conversion. The result was a much nicer photo.
Paul On Mar 24, 2014, at 3:16 PM, Kenneth Waller <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yep. At that point I consider the tiffs as my negative - I don't need to go > back and convert the RAW again. > > -----Original Message----- >> From: Charles Robinson <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: Keep the PEFs? >> >> On Mar 14, 2014, at 23:16 , Ken Waller <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> 1. Should I convert all the old PEF files to DNG? >>> If you're keeping the RAW files I'd say yes. >>> After a time period after RAW file conversion I generall delete the RAW >>> files. >>> >> >> Wow! >> >> To my mind, this is like: "After a time period after making prints from my >> negatives, I generally throw away the negatives". Really? >> >> -Charles > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
