Not to mention that RAW conversion tools are continually improving - the
2012 ACR engine in Photoshop CS6 being one example.
On 3/24/2014 3:57 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I figure my rendering skills are always improving, so I hang onto the RAWs.
Just the other day I wanted to print a picture of my dog who had passed away. I
went back to a 2004 shot I had produced with the *istD. I looked at the tiff
and felt that it left something to be desired. Went back and did a new
conversion. The result was a much nicer photo.
Paul
On Mar 24, 2014, at 3:16 PM, Kenneth Waller <[email protected]> wrote:
Yep. At that point I consider the tiffs as my negative - I don't need to go
back and convert the RAW again.
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Robinson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Keep the PEFs?
On Mar 14, 2014, at 23:16 , Ken Waller <[email protected]> wrote:
1. Should I convert all the old PEF files to DNG?
If you're keeping the RAW files I'd say yes.
After a time period after RAW file conversion I generall delete the RAW files.
Wow!
To my mind, this is like: "After a time period after making prints from my
negatives, I generally throw away the negatives". Really?
-Charles
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
