The 645Z too. :-) Paul via phone
> On Apr 13, 2014, at 7:01 AM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's a valid point. Although I expect the 656z to be price competitive with > the best 24 x 36 cameras. > > Paul via phone > >> On Apr 13, 2014, at 12:24 AM, Brian Walters <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Quoting Paul Stenquist <[email protected]>: >> >>> 51 megapixel 43.8 x 32.8 sensor. ISO to 204,800, and it?s a bit smaller >>> than a Nikon D4. Why would anyone want a 24 x 36 Pentax? >> >> >> Well, I don't, but price is one reason that people still want one. >> >> >> -- >> Cheers >> >> Brian >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Brian Walters >> Western Sydney Australia >> http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
