On 14/4/14, Brian Walters, discombobulated, unleashed: >I thought you were adopting the Ricoh exclusion clause (ie. any full >frame camera will be a Ricoh, not a true Pentax, therefore the >original premise is null and void).
As long as it says Pentax on the front, it's a Pentax in my book. Like a Land Rover - owned by Tata. If it said 'Tata' on the front then it wouldn't be a Land Rover, would it ;-) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) | Web Video Production ---------- <www.seeingeye.tv> _____________________________ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
