Dan, I've never seen/experienced any moire with the K-5IIs. I've never seen or used a K-5II. The K-3 is a tad sharper and better at autofocus, but only a tad. K-5IIs is not my backup camera to the K-3, but I don't hesitate to reach for it. ...Remember, you can't take it with you. Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Daniel J. Matyola <[email protected]> wrote: > I have concluded it is time to upgrade my K-r. > > The K-3 is a bit pricey, and I doubt my limited skill set requires its > sophistication. It looks like I can find a K-5, K-5II or K-IIs at a > price more to my liking, and I suspect any of them would fulfill my > needs. > > I don't really understand the difference between the II and the IIs. > Can anyone give me a reason to get a IIs rather than a II? > > Dan Matyola > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
