>From what I can tell the samyang has better resolution than the sigma. Its also sharper edge to edge. It looks like one hell of a lens.
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Bipin Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Igor, while an f2.8 lens is certainly welcome, I for one would > prefer the Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6, as it gives better flexibility - auto > focus, electronic metering, many lenses in one, cheaper price. > I believe a Tokina version of a SWA Lens is f2.8 too. > Plus my copy of the Sigma is brutally sharp. > And on our European Tour especially in Italy, we found the Tammy 17-50 > f2.8 was not wide enough - huge monuments, tall spires within very > narrow streets were just impossible to capture. > Why even the Eiffel Tower in Paris cannot be captured with the 17-50 > unless you move out further a couple of streets - risking traffic, and > straying far out from your group - we were with the Thomas Cook guided > 3-weeks tour of Western Europe. > All I can say is that you can produce some magic at the 10mm focal > length - one just needs to experiment. > Regards. > Bipin. > camp: Thornhill, Ontario, Canada. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
