On 12/08/2014 11:34 AM, Ed Keeney wrote:
My K100D is running itself into the ground. There is something wrong
with the viewfinder that I can't fix (hard to see through, something
inside the viewfinder itself). Pictures still come out great,
although some hot pixels here and there.
I think I can start to scrape together some funds for a replacement.
Current versions of the Pentax SLR line (prices from B&H)...
K500 - $400 (kit)
K50 - $450
K5 IIs - $700
K3 - $1200
Since I'm on a limited budget and already have multiple lenses, I'm
looking at a body only to save a few dollars.
I know all are an upgrade over my 7+ year old K100D.
I shoot family gatherings, kids sports and landscapes. I don't think
I want to get into video, so that portion of any camera is of limited
interest right now.
My question really is do I spend more on the higher lines or stick
with a lower level camera? Right now, leaning towards a K50, but
wondering if I should scrape up more funds and go with the K5 IIs.
Just looking for your thoughts as I jump into online reviews my
decision making processes.
Cameras are terrible things to bankrupt yourself over. The K3 is a
lovely camera if you can stretch the budget, but if 16mp will do and
your needs and budget are modest, I suspect the K50 would do you just
fine. I suspect all you would be giving up over the K5II is the build.
IIRC, the K50 is a plastic body while the K5 is metal.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
