To more directly address your question - I tend to agree with Christine and 
Paul. Take a minimal travel kit.

K-3 + 12-24 [alt = 15 + 21] + 16-50 [alt = 35 macro] + 50-135 + 1.4x extender 
for bird shots. Period. No backup body, no other lenses, no other camera 
systems.

I remember getting by for weeks on a vacation in England with only an ME-Super 
and a 50/1.4 lens. I get enamored with the range of possibilities inherent with 
the range of lenses etc, but I think I see better when I limit my choices and 
spend more time looking.

stan

On Sep 1, 2014, at 10:45 PM, Stan Halpin <[email protected]> wrote:

> No backup car!?! Man, you are living on the edge!
> 
> But given that you are driving, I would take everything you have mentioned, 
> maybe another favorite lens or two. With a couple of significant provisos:
> A. Double check your insurance policy.
> B. Leave behind a good inventory and list of serial numbers.
> C. Keep your gear sorted/packed in distinct modules. Fun vs. serious, film vs 
> digital, natural light vs IR, et. When you leave the car for serious bird 
> shooting, leave everything else behind. When you wander the shore, carry the 
> Q and/or IR and leave the rest in the car. You WILL miss some opportunities 
> but you are supposedly on vacation. Relax and take what comes along.
> 
> stan
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Sep 1, 2014, at 10:13 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I haven’t taken a vacation in more than 15 years, but if I did I think I’d 
>> probably want to minimize the equipment and the photography. I would take 
>> the K-3, the AF 560 flash, the DA* 16-50 and the DA* 60-250. I might also 
>> take the DA 12-24. If the camera broke, I’d make do with my iPhone. If I 
>> were to drive to the destination, I might take a bit more gear. 
>> 
>> Paul
>>> On Sep 1, 2014, at 8:56 PM, Mark C <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Next week my wife and are taking a vacation to the Washington DC area. I 
>>> plan on checking out the exhibit where I have a couple of photos in 
>>> Annapolis - and that will be one afternoon or morning of our trip. 
>>> Otherwise I am anticipating a blend of urban / rural experience in 
>>> Washington DC, Baltimore and Maryland's eastern shore. We have one wildlife 
>>> refuge on the eastern shore that I really want to visit (if I can figure 
>>> out where it is).
>>> 
>>> OK - so I am trying to travel light. The biggest impediment to that is 
>>> bringing backup bodies and lenses. When you travel - do you carry backup 
>>> gear or just trust to fate that everything will work?
>>> 
>>> I am thinking of bringing (at a minimum) the K3, IR converted K10D, DA 
>>> 17-70, Takumar F 70-200, DFA 100 macro and Sigma 135-400 zoom. All that, 
>>> except for the Sigma, fits in a nice little kit. I plan to also bring my Q 
>>> kit (original Q, fisheye lens, normal zoom, telephoto zoom, normal prime, 
>>> extension tubes) which all fits in a tiny little bag.
>>> 
>>> I will probably want to also bring a film body and normal zoom, and am 
>>> thinking of the Mz-S, sans battery grip, with FA 28-105 zoom. Or I might 
>>> satify the analog urge by bringing a Super Ricoflex TLR and a few rolls of 
>>> 120 film.
>>> 
>>> And then I'd like a fast lens so maybed the A 50mm f1.4 or FA 50 f1.7. I'll 
>>> probably bring the 40mm XR pancake in lieu of a body cap since it is about 
>>> the same size.
>>> 
>>> And then backups and add-ons  - ideally I'd like to bring they K5 (in case 
>>> the K3 breaks), the DA 16-50 (in case the DA 17-70 breaks), Sigma 70-200 
>>> f2.8 as both a backup for the Takumar F and for a faster telephoto zoom, 
>>> and maybe an external flash because it might come in handy...
>>> 
>>> I am thinking of NOT taking the "backups and add-ons" though I will kick 
>>> myself if something breaks or malfunctions on the road. The fast 50 seems 
>>> questionable and I might decide to skip the film gear...
>>> 
>>> This is not a trip of a lifetime but I'll be frustrated if something fails 
>>> along the way. I guess the Q kit is a backup for the overall kit but as 
>>> much as I like the Q kit it does have limits (slow AF, no eye level finder, 
>>> poor high ISO performance, limits on shallow DOF...)
>>> 
>>> What do you do when you travel?
>>> 
>>> FWIW I *am* only taking one automobile but I also know I can always rent 
>>> one if the car have malfunctions (I actually had to do that once in the 
>>> past.)
>>> 
>>> Mark
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
>>> protection is active.
>>> http://www.avast.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to