i bet that no one here could tell a difference between a 2x3 meter print from a 36mpix sensor and the one from a 48mpix sensor. even at close range. i would actually bet.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:57 PM, P.J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that it might well be more than a 28% change in file size, but I'm > not sure at this point, everything even raw files are subject to some kind > of compression these days. > > On 9/11/2014 10:46 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: >> >> Jack Davis <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> And I suspect a rounded pixel count increase of 28% will be viewed as a >>> significant step. >> >> Since the current 36-megapixel camersa already out-resolve most >> available lenses it's a 28% increase in storage space with little or >> no improvement in image quality. >> >> As John says, whether it's successful marketing or not is what counts. >> > > > -- > I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve > immortality through not dying. > -- Woody Allen > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
