On 9/25/2014 2:09 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 06:36:08PM -0400, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Darren Addy <pixelsmi...@gmail.com> wrote:

It strikes me as very odd that an environmentalist like Ansel Adams
might be precluded from photographing in Yosemite (if he were alive
today) when it was his photographs that helped spur the care and
conservation of our National Parks (and in some cases, the creation of
NEW parks) by bringing their stunning beauty to the public's
consciousness.

I think that qualifies as ironic.

Do your homework, guys.  It's just a badly-researched fear-mongering article.

First and foremost, what Ansel Adams did would still be allowed by this.
The rules contain a very clear definition of "commercial work", and selling
prints of half dome is not "commercial work" under that definition.

Secondly: this isn't really anything new.  You already require a permit
for these kinds of things today (model shoots, film crews, etc.)

Reminded me of the flap over Flickr's terms of service a couple of years back.

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to