Follow-up: http://petapixel.com/2014/09/26/forest-service-delays-decision-controversial-permit-rules-amid-public-outcry/
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 7:43 PM, steve harley <[email protected]> wrote: > on 2014-09-24 16:07 Darren Addy wrote >> >> I can perhaps understand the rationale for film crews, but the still >> photography requirement is SILLY, IMHO: >> >> http://petapixel.com/2014/09/24/us-forest-service-proposes-controversial-expensive-photo-permit-rules/#more-146255 > > > today Denver Post digs in a little bit further than that article: > > <http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_26606988/feds-proposal-charge-limit-access-wilderness-areas-draws?source=rss> > > and the Forest Service is trying to clarify, but it still seems pretty muddy > to me; i had gone over the comment page and tried to to read the > regulations, but never really found the > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- Photographers must learn not to be ashamed to have their photographs look like photographs. ~ Alfred Stieglitz -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
