On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Mark C <[email protected]> wrote:
> I finally found the link back to WIllows I... I think that academically #II > is the stronger photo in that the foreground elements (i.e. the rocks) in #I > are broken up a bit - they are in two separate parts of the frame... but; I > really like the submerged rocks int he first frame. I just contributed to > the air of magic and mystery in the image. So #I is more engaging to me > despite a few minor flaws. It's a tough call... Thanks, Mark. When I took the picture, I wanted to include the whole arc of rocks, but that isn't possible without including other things which are just plain ugly. I'm thinking about cloning out the rocks which are not under water in the first version, but it's a lot of work, and not easy to make it believable. Will post if I can make it. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
