I doubt that you could see any difference in image quality between ISO 100 and ISO 200, even at pixel peeping levels. The advantage of having ISO 100 lies in being able to get a slower shutter speed when needed, as when panning or shooting moving water for example.
Paul On Oct 19, 2014, at 4:44 AM, Glen Berry <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm in the habit of shooting at the lowest ISO possible, to get the best > image quality. Lately, I was having second thoughts about shooting my K-30 at > ISO 100. Since ISO 100 is an "extended" ISO, and ISO 200 seems to be the > camera's base ISO, would there be any advantages in image quality when > shooting at 200 ISO? > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
