There would likely not be a discernible difference, Glen. Assuming both images had the benefit of exact conditions at the instant of shutter release. Best take several and weight the results.
Jack ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Roberts" <[email protected]> To: "PDML" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 12:40:10 PM Subject: Re: ISO 100 or 200 for Best Results? Glen Berry wrote: >I'm in the habit of shooting at the lowest ISO possible, to get the best >image quality. Lately, I was having second thoughts about shooting my >K-30 at ISO 100. Since ISO 100 is an "extended" ISO, and ISO 200 seems >to be the camera's base ISO, would there be any advantages in image >quality when shooting at 200 ISO? Why not just take a few identical shots at ISO 100 and ISO 200 and compare them? Am I missing something? -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
