I extracted the polaroid negative (FP-100c film using a Polaroid Land 350 camera), scanned that, and printed it. I think that's 'real' film … :-)
I'd been meaning try the process for a while. Basically, you take a photo, wash the backing off the negative with a light chlorine solution, and then wash and dry the negative. I shot a few test frames to see how it would go. The results are good, but the photos aren't anything I want to post. It was a test … I think I can do the same with FP-3000b, have to experiment. Of course, with integral type films (Impossible film for Spectra, SX-70, etc) there is no separable negative so with those I have to scan or photograph the original positive, and then print that. The original print is still 'real' film… :-) G > On Feb 9, 2015, at 9:43 PM, Ken Waller <[email protected]> wrote: > > Um... yes but did you use real film to do it? You scanned it and printed from > the scan - correct ? > > >> Um, yesterday. I printed two of my Polaroid shots to 9x12. >> >> G >> >>> On Feb 9, 2015, at 8:56 PM, Ken Waller <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I'm talking 'real film' - when's the last time you saw an enlargement from >>> a Polaroid? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
