I wasn't aware there was a Polaroid film with a negative.
I new this list was good for something. <BG>
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 35mm film v 35mm DSLR
I extracted the polaroid negative (FP-100c film using a Polaroid Land 350
camera), scanned that, and printed it.
I think that's 'real' film … :-)
I'd been meaning try the process for a while. Basically, you take a photo,
wash the backing off the negative with a light chlorine solution, and then
wash and dry the negative. I shot a few test frames to see how it would
go. The results are good, but the photos aren't anything I want to post.
It was a test …
I think I can do the same with FP-3000b, have to experiment.
Of course, with integral type films (Impossible film for Spectra, SX-70,
etc) there is no separable negative so with those I have to scan or
photograph the original positive, and then print that. The original print
is still 'real' film… :-)
G
On Feb 9, 2015, at 9:43 PM, Ken Waller <[email protected]> wrote:
Um... yes but did you use real film to do it? You scanned it and printed
from the scan - correct ?
Um, yesterday. I printed two of my Polaroid shots to 9x12.
G
On Feb 9, 2015, at 8:56 PM, Ken Waller <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm talking 'real film' - when's the last time you saw an enlargement
from a Polaroid?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
