The quote from the London Gallery owner is pretty telling, not so much
about Lik, but certianly about the Art photography marked. Let's see,
Rhine II, wasn't exactly a photograph, it was a heavily Photoshopped
inkjet, (Oh, I'm sorry, perhaps I should have used the word Gilcee
instead of inkjet), print. Yet I'll bet that gallery owner didn't blink
an eye when it sold for $1.3 million. From what I've seen of Lik's work
it doesn't require eye bleach, (such as Thomas Kinkade's did). It just
seems that he's found a way to legally separate money from rich people
with more money than brains without needing a middle man. More power to
him I say.
On 2/22/2015 4:39 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
So is Lik's work resellable for a lot of money? Apparently, not so much.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/business/peter-liks-recipe-for-success-sell-prints-print-money.html
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
immortality through not dying.
-- Woody Allen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
