Thanks again :-)

I see your point, and I think the things you mention are the ones I like about 
the results. I think maybe my appreciation of silence is helpful in omitting 
the unnecessary details, but the the crowds and the staging was a bit too much. 
There are several other carnivals other places, not as staged, maybe not as 
spectacular costumes, but probably more natural and playful.  It would be nice 
to try to take the same kind of pictures under those conditions.

And I really appreciate your comments to these pictures. It is something I can 
use under other conditions too :-)

DagT



> 27. feb. 2015 kl. 00.36 skrev Bruce Walker <[email protected]>:
> 
> Dag, don't let the naysayers[*] influence you away from this kind of
> work. You have a well developed eye for selecting the perfect
> composition that isolates the subject and omits unnecessary detail.
> Really! This is outstanding stuff. These folks should have all been
> handing you their cards.
> 
> --
> *  I mean no disrespect, Ann, and Dag's unnamed wife. :)
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:52 PM, DagT <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Well Ann, you remind me of a friend who said this when he heard where I was 
>> going: What´s a minimalist like you going to do in a place like that :-)
>> 
>> And my wife agrees with you.
>> 
>> But it was an interesting experience. I did try to work on the backgrounds 
>> and what you could see of the eyes. To steal the small moments that were not 
>> completely staged, and while I like the results I don´t think I´ll do it 
>> again. I prefer a bit more silence.
>> 
>> DagT
>> 
>>> 26. feb. 2015 kl. 22.36 skrev Ann Sanfedele <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>> Dag -
>>> I love your minimalist photography and your photos in general but I only 
>>> did a fast skim of these - a little cramped for time here still trying to 
>>> catch up on stuff from idleness recently...
>>> 
>>> as photography, it's your usual excellent talent shining through -
>>> but the scene you encountered in Venice would have sent me running in the 
>>> other direction had I been there on two levels, lots of other photographers 
>>> around and extremely madeup subjects that come off to me
>>> as somewhat sinister in flavor. Like clowns.
>>> 
>>> back to your sweet kids please :-)
>>> 
>>> ann
>>> 
>>> On 2/26/2015 15:59, DagT wrote:
>>>> Thanks :-)
>>>> 
>>>> Venice was an interesting place. The models were dressed to be 
>>>> photographed and wanted to pose, so the main problem was to avoid all the 
>>>> other photographers. If the model notice you they will give you a card so 
>>>> you could send them the pictures.
>>>> 
>>>> Actually it was nice to be there with Pentax with some Limited lenses, 
>>>> among lots  of large lenses, flashes and tripods. I didn´t get very much 
>>>> attention (and therefore very few cards) but for the most part managed to 
>>>> got the pictures I wanted.
>>>> 
>>>> DagT
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 25. feb. 2015 kl. 20.52 skrev Rick Womer <[email protected]>:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Outstanding, Dag! I particularly like the shots with interesting
>>>>> backgrounds; my overall favorite is the next-to-last shot in the 5th
>>>>> row.
>>>>> 
>>>>> How did you get so much cooperation from so many celebrants?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Rick
>>>>> http://photo.net/photos/RickW
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Daniel J. Matyola <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> That should be labeled a GESO, rather a PESO.  <G>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That is a fascinating collection of incredible images!  Thanks for
>>>>>> sharing them all.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> They are all masterful, but my favorites are 1034, 1058 and 1065.
>>>>>> Dan Matyola
>>>>>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:46 PM, DagT <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> I had a few days last week just for taking picture. Too many, of 
>>>>>>> course, but some of them may be seen here:
>>>>>>> http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/photos-3/Venice2015.html
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> DagT
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>>> follow the directions.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -bmw
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to