"what you see is not what you get" side of TLR photography? Can't say for all of them, but the Rolleicord I am using has an automatic parallax correction. That makes it much better than a rangefinder: what I see is exactly what I get. 100% frame in the finder. I suppose if I were to do macro with it that would have been a problem. But since the lenses are fixed, there's a very slim chance of ever running into that problem <g> And, yes, 6x7 is great.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:31 PM Subject: Re: 67 Experience > Sounds like a plan. We have to get a 67 in Shel's hands before he goes > TLR. Seriously, anyone considering a TLR must shoot and develop a roll > of film in the TLR before buying. You have to experience the "what you > see is not what you get" side of TLR photography. I lived with it for > many years. The Pentax 6x7 was a godsend. > Paul - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
