Well said, Frank!
J

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 23, 2015, at 8:11 PM, Knarf <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This is NOT about political correctness, Paul. I know those are among the 
> biggest swear-words in your vocabulary, so anything that you strongly 
> disagree with has to do with "political correctness".
> 
> I really don't give a flying F about the story or the stageplay or the movie. 
> On the face of them, these photos objectify and demean women. They portray 
> women in a sexual way that men are not generally portrayed. 
> 
> That's why they are sexist. Why is that so difficult to understand? If men 
> dressed and posed this way it would look ridiculous. Yet when women do it, 
> it's okay? 
> 
> I will reiterate yet again: This is NOT about nudity. This is not about skin. 
> 
> This is about a sexual depiction of a woman in a way that a man would never 
> be depicted.
> 
> As for Renoir and Michelangelo, their depictions of female nudes were neither 
> suggestive nor sexual. And in the case of Michelangelo, he also did male 
> nudes (hello: David?) so at least there was some balance.
> 
> There is, quite frankly, no comparison between the female nude in Western art 
> and Bruce's Cabaret photos. 
> 
> I'm not calling for the banning of anything, I'm not calling for censorship. 
> I'm asking that we try to understand why depictions like the Cabaret series 
> can be harmful to an identifiable group (in this case, women) and govern 
> ouselves accordingly. 
> 
> Here's a question to honestly ask yourself: How would you feel if it was your 
> daughter or grand daughter in those photos? Would you be okay with that? 
> Wouldn't make you feel uncomfortable in the least? Really?
> 
> I know how I'd feel. And that's why I know that this is not something I feel 
> right about.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> frank
> 
>> On 23 August, 2015 10:37:44 PM EDT, paul stenquist <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> I’m hesitant to address this, but I’m also confused, so I think I’ll
>> speak up. These photos are a very accurate depiction of Cabaret, they
>> capture the essence of the story, as produced both in the theater and
>> on film Are they exploitative merely because they are mildly erotic, as
>> was the original? And if these photos are exploitative does that mean
>> Renoir and Michelangelo and countless other artists who depicted the
>> female form are somehow violating some kind of arbitrary moral standard
>> as well? I think that if we were to agree that is the case, it would be
>> a sad commentary on the human condition. Eroticism banned. A new
>> Puritan age. A banal existence, mandated by political correctness.
>> 
>> Paul
>>> On Aug 23, 2015, at 10:01 PM, Knarf <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Nah, not riled up. Just not happy about the subject matter (I don't
>> mean Dorrie, of course, I mean what I see as the exploitative way she's
>> portrayed). 
>>> 
>>> But I've said my piece on that score. I'll simply not comment on
>> these types of photos, except maybe every couple of months or so, as a
>> "these are demeaning to women" reminder.
>>> 
>>> Bruce knows I think he's a wonderful photographer, both technically
>> and artistically, and I'm sure he understands that my lack of comment
>> is not a lack of opinion on his work.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> frank
>>> 
>>> cheers,
>>> 
>>> frank
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Daniel J. Matyola
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Now you have really done it!  This will certainly get Knarf all
>> riled
>>>> up .  .  .  .
>>>> 
>>>> Very well done indeed.  My only negative is the pasties.  They are
>> not
>>>> attractive or tasteful, and they actually give  a greater feeling of
>>>> exploitation, rather than less.
>>>> Dan Matyola
>>>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Bruce Walker
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> A creative project that my designer and I worked on over 8 weeks,
>> then
>>>>> 6 hours shooting, and a month waiting for the publication embargo
>> to
>>>>> end ... has finally been published.
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://nifmagazine.com/cabaret-by-bruce-walker/
>>>>> 
>>>>> An image from it will also appear in the UK print magazine Femme
>>>>> Rebelle in September.
>>>>> 
>>>>> All images: K-3, DA* 16-50/2.8
>>>>> Lighting is from three Einsteins with an assortment of mods and
>>>>> shtuff. My lighting design.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Model: Dorrie Mack
>>>>> Makeup and hair: Coral Brandenburg
>>>>> Designer and stylist: Eva Mocek/GearPunk’D
>>>>> Assistant: Anique Alletson
>>>>> Photographer and Artistic Director: Bruce Walker
>>>>> 
>>>>> GearPunk’D (Eva) custom made a gold jacket, punk-influenced
>> long-line
>>>>> corset and matching choker, shorts and pasties for Dorrie.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Comments will be warmly embraced!
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> -bmw
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
>> and follow the directions.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
>> and follow the directions.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
>> and follow the directions.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
> 
> -- 
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to