I think the question was how to go about doing it the other way, take
your digital image and convert it into an old-fashioned film slide.
Seems like there's basically only two ways - set up your film camera
like a copy stand and photograph the image on your monitor *OR* send the
high-res digital file out to a service bureau ... with a dearth of
options in between.
If anyone has ideas for something in between that provides better
results (with less aggravation) than the copy-stand/monitor method *AND*
lower cost than the service bureau method, I'd really like to know.
On 8/26/2015 12:27 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
There use to be available an attachment for the end of the Pentax
bellows unit that allowed the copying of slides by a camera/lens setup.
I have one, I've used it - it worked well.
Other similar devices were available from other sources. If you can find
one, you could use your digital camera of choice and copy your slides
that way. Worth trying IMO.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message ----- From: "Malcolm Smith"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Slides and film question.
Some months ago I asked a question about how best to transfer slides to
digital images. All is good with that, and the slow scanning transfer
continues. Probably for several years as time allows.
However, I was asked the other day how to do this the other way,
transfer a
digital image to a 35mm slide. As I still live in the 1970s and shoot
film
and have slide shows etc, that rather appealed to me to have a go
myself. A
look on-line showed there were companies out there who would do this,
but I
want to be able to have a try at this from home without the need for
further
expense in equipment. Obviously, companies aren't exactly up front on how
they achieve this, but I presume they are sent the images by e-mail,
convert
them to a certain standard pixel image size, and have some way of
mounting a
film camera to view the image in sort of dark room conditions to exclude
other light sources?
If it were a picture or a document, it would be more straight forward
to use
a duplicating stand with appropriate lighting. The only thing that
came to
mind was taking a picture of the image on a computer screen in a darkened
room (image displayed at a size which would result in a full frame
capture,
camera tripod mounted), but I want to ensure that a quality image
remains a
quality image when transferred to film and projected (no pixels!). Those
companies doing this commercially are displaying the digital image on
something from which they take a film image; I just suspect that their
'something' is considerably better than I have available at home. I have
tried doing the above with a digital camera+tripod/computer screen,
just to
see how it comes out, and some results have been OK. I'm not aiming
for OK,
I'm aiming for good as a minimum, and it must be repeatable time after
time.
Anyone tried this or is it just me....? I thought this was also a
different,
although backwards technologically, method of keeping certain images
stored.
Malcolm
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
