The lettering on the wire appears (to me) a tiny bit crisper in the pixel shift version.
On 10/23/2015 12:01 AM, Alan C wrote:
Am I missing something? Can't see a difference. Alan C -----Original Message----- From: Darren Addy Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:04 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11 My K-3II arrived today and so I had to try out the Pixel Shift Resolution during afternoon break. Found an obliging dusty rack of electrical wire that agreed to serve as my subject. The 77mm f/1.8 limited is a very sharp lens (as anyone who has one will tell you). What you see in the link below is an image blown up to 100% (actual pixels). Each is an 863 pixel x 994 pixel crop of the full 6016 x 4000 pixel image. Conditions: Same exposure (2 sec. f/11, ISO 100) focused manually, shutter fired with the 12 second self-timer. The only thing that changed between shots was that I turned on Pixel Shift Resolution (without moving anything). On the left is a standard out of camera JPEG and on the right the JPEG produced with Pixel Shift Resolution. Click on it with your browser cursor to see it at 100%: http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/PSRComparison.jpg At least for cooperative subjects, it looks (to me) like all my lenses just magically got significantly better.
-- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
