I was being ironic. I neither meant nor said it. There are some places that it's best tourists ~not~ go to. I'm not sure but the Black Hills may be one such place.
I was initially reacting to Bob's post, merely pointing out that tourism isn't always a good thing. Tourism ~in and of itself~ is not a sufficient reason to physically alter this landscape on such a grand scale. Cheers, frank On October 25, 2015 4:11:09 PM EDT, John <[email protected]> wrote: >Might have been what you meant, but it's *NOT* what you wrote. > >On 10/25/2015 2:08 PM, knarf wrote: >> That's EXACTLY what I said, Paul. It's either "tourism everywhere" or >"tourism nowhere". >> >> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma >> >> Cheers, >> >> frank >> >> On October 25, 2015 1:45:14 PM EDT, Paul Stenquist ><[email protected]> wrote: >>> Are tourists desirable anywhere? We could all stay in our rooms with >>> shades drawn. >>> >>> Paul via phone >>> >>>> On Oct 25, 2015, at 12:38 PM, knarf <[email protected]> >wrote: >>>> >>>> Is bringing tourists out there desirable? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> frank >>>> -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -- Henri Cartier-Bresson Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
