knarf wrote: >Wow, Mark! I was totally making that shit up as I went along. Who knew it was >actually accurate?
;-) By the way, there *is* disagreement among historians about whether the goal of Hitler's invasion of Russia was the destruction of the communist Soviet Union itself or to convince Britain to surrender by removing the USSR as a potential ally. There are good cases made on both sides. >On November 15, 2015 8:42:04 PM EST, Mark Roberts <postmas...@robertstech.com> >wrote: >>Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >>>Thanks. It certainly makes more sense than your attempt to rationalize >>Hitler's goals. That's laughable. >> >>??? He wasn't rationalizing Hitler's goals! He was *describing* them. >>Quite accurately, too. Check out Ian Kershaw's superb biography of >>Hitler. It's a big two volumes but well worth the effort. Generally >>considered the best historical biography of Hitler. John Lukacs' >>various books on the war may be better for a casual read ? try The >>"Lase European War" or "The Duel". Great stuff and they, like most >>historians, agree with Kershaw on Hitler's goals. -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
