>Very well, I'll reply to your previous nonsense and you're welcome to reply to whatever nonsense I write, and after that I surrender. > >B
No. Either good conversation or I, going back to what I posted much earlier, acknowledge that it was my mistaking what I thought the conversation might become. People of "faith" are not dumb and blind as some seem to assume. (OK, I'll qualify that: Many take a non-intellectual approach. But that's not the sum and substance of Christianity.) The past 4 decades has seen the rise, or should I say resurgence, of the Christian philosopher. There are many, many of us who relish the hard questions. What we often challenge in return is certain illogic and assumptions. We love history. The Bible is an historical document in that it presents God as providential over time, an abductive presentation of His presence and sovereignty. A goodly number of us dig into philosophy. For me it is philosophy of science. History has meaning and, to borrow a title, ideas have consequences. Enjoy your day. I'll respect your choice. Only let's be civil. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
