Eye detail is clearly visible on my computer and phone. I had uploaded a 
version with brighter mid tones but it felt washed out to me, so I went back to 
the original.

Paul via phone

> On Dec 20, 2015, at 5:29 PM, Ken Waller <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The eye detail is almost unseen in the smaller image.
> 
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: PESO Pretty Lady
> 
> 
>> I've gone back and forth on some levels values.
>> 
>> Paul via phone
>> 
>>> On Dec 20, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Jack Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I notice that the Cardinal's eye has become more visible since I looked at 
>>> it earlier this AM. Good!
>>> Well done shopping!
>>> 
>>> J
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Ken Waller" <[email protected]>
>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 11:22:46 AM
>>> Subject: Re: PESO Pretty Lady
>>> 
>>> Well captured Paul.
>>> 
>>> If it were mine I crop out some of the RH side.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Paul Stenquist <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: PESO Pretty Lady
>>>> 
>>>> This morning at the Johnson Nature Center in Bloomfield Hills, MI, K3, DFA 
>>>> 150-450/4.5-5.6 plus DA1.4X converter, f8, 1/125th, ISO 1600, 630mm focal 
>>>> length, cropped to about 50% of frame.
>>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18144667&size=lg
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to