It's fine in the larger version.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PESO Pretty Lady
Eye detail is clearly visible on my computer and phone. I had uploaded a
version with brighter mid tones but it felt washed out to me, so I went
back to the original.
Paul via phone
On Dec 20, 2015, at 5:29 PM, Ken Waller <[email protected]> wrote:
The eye detail is almost unseen in the smaller image.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PESO Pretty Lady
I've gone back and forth on some levels values.
Paul via phone
On Dec 20, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Jack Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
I notice that the Cardinal's eye has become more visible since I looked
at it earlier this AM. Good!
Well done shopping!
J
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Waller" <[email protected]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 11:22:46 AM
Subject: Re: PESO Pretty Lady
Well captured Paul.
If it were mine I crop out some of the RH side.
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Stenquist <[email protected]>
Subject: PESO Pretty Lady
This morning at the Johnson Nature Center in Bloomfield Hills, MI, K3,
DFA 150-450/4.5-5.6 plus DA1.4X converter, f8, 1/125th, ISO 1600,
630mm focal length, cropped to about 50% of frame.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18144667&size=lg
.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
