All good points, P.J.
Odds are good that you are right and my conjecture is all wet.

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 8:27 PM, P.J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote:
> But we all knew that was less than smart.  Though Fuji seems to be doing a
> pretty good job with their APS-C only system.  (Though Fuji fanboys also
> seem to have FF vs APS-C flame wars.  Which is pretty funny considering that
> for Fuji APS-C is full frame)*.
>
> *I've also seen full frame vs M43 flame wars on Panasonic and Olympus fora,
> which is also pretty funny.
>
>
> On 1/17/2016 9:19 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> They already tried explaining the reasoning behind pursuing an APS-C
>> only product line, and see where that got them.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 8:56 PM, P.J. Alling <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I can't imagine why they would go with a 42mp sensor.  Extreme high
>>> resolution mp sensors are for companies that don't have a medium format
>>> solution on the shelf. What you want to do is educate the user base on
>>> why
>>> they should want to aspire to having a medium format system, and make the
>>> reasons for having a Pentax more compelling than the competition, and how
>>> could it not be, since the competition is either outrageously priced or
>>> even
>>> more outrageously priced?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/17/2016 8:35 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I continue to believe that it will be the 42MP Sony sensor used in the
>>>> Sony Sony a7R II and recently Cyber-shot RX1R II. A 36MP sensor would
>>>> be a significant upgrade from the current 24.3MP APS-C line, of
>>>> course, but that 36MP sensor has been around so long that I feel
>>>> Pentax would be opening themselves up to "Why didn't I just switch
>>>> brands when Nikon released the 800/800E 4 years earlier (though, to be
>>>> fair, the Pentax offering would probably be better compared with the
>>>> Nikon D810, which was introduced a mere TWO years ago).
>>>>
>>>> Based on what other manufacturer's full frame camera owners have said,
>>>> a full frame sensor will definitely impact the selection of lenses you
>>>> are satisfied with. You don't have to be a big pixel peeper to detect
>>>> poor corner performance and this is the area that I expect to be the
>>>> differentiator. Although it is "mind over matter". If you don't mind -
>>>> it don't matter!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 1:58 PM, John <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/17/2016 12:51 PM, Kim Tang wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good Sunday morning.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any bets as to what size sensor, in MP, the K-1 will have? 24, 36, 42?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Manufacturer?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How will a given size impact lens suitability?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm coming from a K20D.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kim
>>>>>>
>>>>> Rumors I remember have it as the same sensor Sony used in their A7r. Be
>>>>> nice if it's the same as the A7r II.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
>>>>> Religion - Answers we must never question.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
>>> immortality through not dying.
>>> -- Woody Allen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>> follow the directions.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
> immortality through not dying.
> -- Woody Allen
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.



-- 
Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to