Alin, I'm curious to know how you found that out. Is it due to what you have seen in your own images or was that information available somewhere? I realize that it is hard to tell in small scans the problem you are describing, but I haven't really noticed it in my shots.
Do you have some comparisons so that I would recognize the issue in my own images? Could you show us the images that were unsatisfatory and caused you to quit using this film? I'm really curious because I am having great results with this film. Thanks, Bruce Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 6:40:40 AM, you wrote: AF> Optima II is significantly more saturated than the average film on AF> the blue and red ends of the spectrum. Check: AF> http://pug.komkon.org/01jul/HereComesTheSun.html AF> Despite it's good colour balance and fine grain, beware of the poor AF> antihalation protection of the film. Sharp edges between lights and AF> shadows are fuzzier than on most other 100 ASAs. Sadly, I had to AF> part with it just for this reason. T>> About that Agfa Optima II- when you say the blues are vivid, T>> does the film have a bluish cast to it overall or is it just that T>> the color saturation is excellent? AF> Servus, Alin AF> - AF> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, AF> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to AF> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
