I used the 645 for landscapes/nature for two years (almost), and was very happy with it. The light meter behaves very much like any other center-weight meter (eg. SuperA/ProgramA, P30/P50, etc.). Only one small inconvenience with the interface: The buttons are too small for operating with gloves on...
Jostein http://oksne.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "pentax-discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 6:40 PM Subject: 645 vs 645n( or 645nii)? > So, I'm pricing out MF options. Looks like I can score a 645 body in nice > condition with insert for something like $700 from KEH. A 645n body with > insert is closer to, say, $1400. > > I like the 645n user interface better, but autofocus seems pretty optional > for a landscape camera. Is there anything about the original 645 that is > bad or problematic? Any good reason to stay away? > > --Mark > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
