Kim Tang <[email protected]> wrote: >Thanks Malcom and Darren and all who answered. > >I was browsing archive and saw Darren was experimenting with Pentax Bellows >II. > >Did you ever get it to work? Have yet to watch video. > >I most likely do scanner, as it seems easiest.
In case you haven't seen these: http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2012/01/scan-film-with-camera-1.html http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2012/01/how-to-scan-film-2.html Ctein's summary: "OK, I thought my position on this was pretty clear from my articles and comments over the last two columns. Apparently not. So here it is, with no minced words: "I think digitizing film positives and negatives by photographing them with a digital camera is a bad idea. Most people will get worse results than they would with a reasonably-priced flatbed scanner. Ninety-nine-plus percent of them will get worse results than they would with a decent film scanner or with sending their film to a dollar-a-scan service. I have not been encouraging anyone to do this. Quite the opposite. My hope is to discourage people from wasting their time even trying." -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
