I didn't know Rawtherapee existed until yesterday.  Just installed on UBUNTU
12.something and it works fine.  It's a 7-8 year old Samsung laptop - quite high
spec for the time, with a multicore processor, 8Gb of memory and 500Gb HDD - and
the only thing that might slow it down will be the onboard graphics.  If I pixel
peep, it takes about 5 seconds for the image to re-render (demosaic)  when I
move it.

> On 13 February 2016 at 23:48 "P.J. Alling" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> I was using it on windows, Win2K IIRC. I expect that it's improved 
> immensely in the last few years, and it has been a quite a few years 
> since I used it.  I never used it on Linux.  I had a headless file 
> server, running Linux, and Samba, (for file storage), but hadn't 
> installed a GUI so I have no idea how well behaved the Linux version 
> is.  That server has been replace with a single external USB drive with 
> roughly four times the storage by the way.  I do have the hardware 
> somewhere, it probably still runs, but just isn't worth resurrecting.
> 
> On 2/13/2016 3:19 PM, Mark C wrote:
> > Thanks, PJ - where using Raw Therapee on WIndows or Linux? I would 
> > probably only use it if I decide to abandon Vista and convert the PC 
> > to a Linux variant.
> >
> > On 2/13/2016 2:05 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> >> I tried RawTherapee, back when Adobe killed RSE, it wasn't bad, but 
> >> there was a serious bug when opening K20D files, even to simply 
> >> display the thumbnail view. The program would at best simply go away, 
> >> a crash that left no vestiges of the software in memory.  At worst it 
> >> would lock resources requiring extreme measures to even get a PC to 
> >> reboot. It was also quite slow on the machine I was using at the time 
> >> when processing *istD[s] files.  After a few months of waiting for a 
> >> fix I uninstalled it and moved on.
> >>
> >> On 2/13/2016 1:44 PM, Mark C wrote:
> >>> My scanning PC is setup as a dual boot into either Lubuntu or Win 
> >>> XP. I need XP to run NikonScan but have played around in Lubuntu a 
> >>> bit. I test drove Gimp and Darktable but they really did not catch 
> >>> my fancy. That was a couple of years ago so maybe they have 
> >>> improved, and i never tried RawTherapee or Shotwell.
> >>>
> >>> After a clean install of Vista (not from the disk image files) I 
> >>> found that I still could not install the utilities I had tried 
> >>> earlier. I grabbed older versions of each and to my surprise found 
> >>> that they installed fine. Maybe something in the installer changed 
> >>> over time and made it incompatible with Vista. Or maybe there were 
> >>> still Vista updates pending that would fix the issue.  At least the 
> >>> clean install is free of all the crap that came bundled with the 
> >>> laptop.
> >>>
> >>> Mark
> >>>
> >>> On 2/13/2016 12:43 PM, Henk Terhell wrote:
> >>>> No doubt you can blow new life to your laptop with a light-weight 
> >>>> linux distro such as Lubuntu or Xubuntu.
> >>>>  But you will have to  get used to the photo software (GIMP, 
> >>>> RawTherapee, Darktable, Shotwell).
> >>>> I have installed these all but my preference is still also LR with 
> >>>> Elements.
> >>>>
> >>>> Henk
> >>>>
> >>>> Op 2016-02-13 om 18:03 schreef Mark C:
> >>>>> Thanks, I may give that a try.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Unfortunately, Vista glitches wasted no time in arriving and I'm 
> >>>>> suddenly blocked form installing many pieces of software. Clicking 
> >>>>> on some .exe installers results in absolutely nothing happening, 
> >>>>> while some do install and any installed .exe works fine. I think 
> >>>>> it may be due to the anti-virus software blocking something or 
> >>>>> having corrupted a registry setting. So, I am again re-installing 
> >>>>> Vista and if it fails this time I think it is time to move on to a 
> >>>>> new device....
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There are linux distros that claim to support this laptop, but I 
> >>>>> have not been successful in finding Linux software that I like for 
> >>>>> photo processing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mark
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2/12/2016 3:26 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> >>>>>> Depending on how much processing you want to do on the road, 
> >>>>>> Faststone
> >>>>>> Image Viewer is a low cost (as in no cost) option.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If you set up the settings correctly, it will read raw files (rather
> >>>>>> than just the embedded previews) and it has a limited range of 
> >>>>>> editing
> >>>>>> options (Levels, curves, colour correction etc).  It's useful if you
> >>>>>> just want to develop a few jpgs while travelling.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Brian
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>> Brian Walters
> >>>>>> Western Sydney Australia
> >>>>>> http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016, at 01:56 PM, Mark C wrote:
> >>>>>>> A couple days ago I dropped my 9 year old laptop and the hard 
> >>>>>>> drive was
> >>>>>>> trashed. I replaced it with one that I had on hand and am now 
> >>>>>>> completing
> >>>>>>> the process of downloading and applying every Windows Vista 
> >>>>>>> update patch
> >>>>>>> ever issued... One of the few things I still use this laptop for is
> >>>>>>> processing photos while traveling. My phone now handles email, 
> >>>>>>> casual
> >>>>>>> web browsing, etc.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The laptop has a decent dual core processor (Intel Core 2 T5300) 
> >>>>>>> and 4
> >>>>>>> gigs of ram. I've been using Photoshop CS 5.1 and bridge to 
> >>>>>>> review and
> >>>>>>> do some light processing of photos.  K3 DNG files are pretty 
> >>>>>>> slow on
> >>>>>>> this setup, K5 files were not too bad.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So - before I reinstall Photoshop, any suggestions about a 
> >>>>>>> leaner and
> >>>>>>> faster program for basic raw file processing? I don't want to 
> >>>>>>> spend much
> >>>>>>> money since I could upgrade to a much more competent laptop for 
> >>>>>>> a few
> >>>>>>> hundred dollars. But maybe there is a sleek and simple photo 
> >>>>>>> editor out
> >>>>>>> there.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm also wondering if an earlier version of Photoshop might be 
> >>>>>>> the sweet
> >>>>>>> spot in terms of light footprint.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Any suggestions?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Mark
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> >>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> >>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---
> > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
> immortality through not dying.
> -- Woody Allen
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to