Wasn't that the original selling point that made the mirrorless systems
so popular; that they are generally likely to be smaller because they
don't need the bulk of the mirror mechanism?
On 2/19/2016 1:13 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Why? Because you believe that "mirrorless cameras can only be dinky little
things"??
That's ridiculous, PJ.
G
On Feb 18, 2016, at 9:46 PM, P.J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote:
Well, the Leica SL is huge for a mirrorless camera, even a FF
mirroless, like the Sony A7II. It's all relative really.
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
