Yep, that has to be correct. It looks like the Tamron, and it's priced about the same. Works for me.
Paul via phone Paul via phone > On Feb 19, 2016, at 5:53 PM, John <[email protected]> wrote: > > According to the reviews I've seen on line, it's a re-badged Tamron lens. > >> On 2/19/2016 3:05 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: >> It's supposed to be the same as the Tokina, hopefully a product of the >> Pentax/Tokina collaboration of a few years ago that produced the 10-17mm >> fisheye, not just a rebrand. Popular Photography has an online review >> of it, they think it's good. >> >> http://www.popphoto.com/lens-test-tokina-at-x-24-70mm-f-28-pro-fx >> >>> On 2/19/2016 2:18 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: >>> What’s the consensus on this lens? That’s a focal length I’m going to >>> need, but i haven’t read much about it. >>> >>> Paul > > -- > Science - Questions we may never find answers for. > Religion - Answers we must never question. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
