Make that the 70-200/2.8. Paul via phone
Paul via phone > On Mar 11, 2016, at 8:52 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't care about weight. I'm steadier and smoother with big heavy > equipment. The 150/450 and 24-70 are both right there. The 70-300 will round > out my kit. But I do think I may use my 50/1.4 and 35/2 more.I'm also anxious > to see if I can still focus the superb SMC Pentax 85/1.8. > > Paul via phone > > > > Paul via phone >>> On Mar 11, 2016, at 8:44 PM, steve harley <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 2016-03-11 16:42 , Larry Colen wrote: >>> Primes are still incredibly relevant in my opinion. >> >> not just for low light, for low weight too >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
