Claudette Colbert; hmm, yes, I see that in a number of her shots.
Louise will like that. :)

Thank you, Ann!


On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:16 PM, ann sanfedele <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> could be...  it is fine on Tumblr. No idea why it freezes on your other site 
> but
> since I see your work on facebook fine always.
>
> This portrait reminds me of Claudette Colbert  - fun stuff!
>
> ann
>
>
> On 4/1/2016 1:00 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> It's got to be some Javascript-blocking stuff, John (and Ann). You use
>> that, I believe?
>>
>> I just put it on Tumblr. Try this link:
>> http://off-axis.brucemwalker.com/image/142075134442
>>
>> Lack of shadows? Take another look. :)  Mucho shadow there, especially
>> in the lower third.
>>
>> As for retouching: I know. I have two prints of before and after on
>> Joan Crawford. Six hours of working with a pencil on the negative by
>> the retoucher, and the glam polish is there.
>>
>> Now that meticulous retouching applied much less to older women that
>> he photographed. He did not turn them into freaks, just reduced and
>> softened lines in a pleasant way.  I can safely assure you that I did
>> serious retouching to my wife who is in her mid 70's -- shh!
>>
>> I have the definitive book on the man and his work, and I have studied
>> it thoroughly. "George Hurrell's Hollywood: Glamour Portraits
>> 1925-1992",  Mark A. Vieira. The author had access to Hurrell like few
>> others and he documents his various "periods" and the lighting and
>> retouching techniques he employed. Other than using gridded silver
>> reflectors rather than fresnel spots I followed the way he worked
>> during the 1940's very closely.
>>
>> https://www.amazon.ca/George-Hurrells-Hollywood-Portraits-1925-1992/dp/0762450398/
>>
>> Thanks for your comments, John!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:39 PM, John <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/1/2016 10:29 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:17 PM, John <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/20/2016 3:03 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A while back I got it in mind to explore the 1930's/1940's George
>>>>>> Hurrell Hollywood glamour look and I kept pursuing it on and off until
>>>>>> I got this shot of Louise last Thursday ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://portfolio.brucemwalker.com/#!/index/I0000gv_.gI.8h3w
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I finally think I am getting somewhere. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 645Z, DFA645 90mm f:2.8 Macro, f:4, 1/125th sec, 100 ISO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Key light: 22" beauty dish with 15 degree grid, above-left.
>>>>>> Hair, rim light: 8.5" reflector, boomed above directly behind.
>>>>>> Background light: 7" reflector with barn doors and 30 degree grid, low
>>>>>> camera-left.
>>>>>> Fill: white foamcore v-flat bouncing spill from rim light, camera-right.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Makeup/hair: Judi Willrich
>>>>>> Styling: Louise
>>>>>> Set design: me
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Comments most certainly welcome!
>>>>>>
>>>>> Nice attractive portrait, but I don't think you've quite captured the
>>>>> essence of George Hurrell yet.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> John, could you elaborate? I'm very curious about what you find missing.
>>>>
>>> It's been a week or more, and your image just opens a blank new page now.
>>>
>>> But, I think it was the shadows or lack there of. Hurrell used a lot of
>>> deep shadow for dramatic effect.
>>>
>>> Hurrell was also an extremist when retouching. No flaw was too small for
>>> him to remove it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
>>> Religion - Answers we must never question.
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>> follow the directions.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.




-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to