On 2/4/16, Igor PDML-StR, discombobulated, unleashed: >I am trying to understand preferences of different people. >Here are three different shots of flowers: >http://42graphy.org/misc/FlowersToChoose/ >I would appreciate if you can tell me which of these three work or do not >work for you. And, it would be especially valuable if you can say why.
Last one 967 is the best, gives a nice size differential between foreground and background (in this case I identify foreground as everything in focus and background as everything behind the foreground that is not in focus). The depth of field helps concentrate the viewing to areas of interest in the photograph. If it were mine I would darken it down and increase the saturation to make it a bit more vivid, possibly even surreal. The finished image is what I personally present for viewing, not a faithful representation of the scene (as I don't believe such a thing can exist). 965 has some merit but can't see that it's much. 966 has distracting dark lines top left. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) | Web Video Production ---------- <www.seeingeye.tv> _____________________________ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
