>> I might be missing the point here, but the camera seems
>> reminiscent of a T90, whilst the lens resembles a Nikkor 600mm -
>> the gold band at the front, the wide focus ring, but the tripod
>> mount looks wrong.
> Aw, Peter, you can even read the "PENTAX" label painted on the
> extended lens hood in the photo - unless part of the camouflage
> involved making some Nikon lens look like a Pentax A* 600/5.6 -
> <g>.
And by the way, speaking of Nikon and Pentax, when are you going to
rename your "Other Brands" page to "Pentax"? All that's on it now
is Pentax gear - the only vestigial Olympus mention is the left-over
single word "Olympus" at the very bottom of the page. It would look
a lot nicer to us Pentaxers (many of whom are your customers, I
would like to "subtly" point out - <g>) to see the Home page links
read as "Nikon" and "Pentax", rather than "Nikon" and "Other Brands"
(of which you have only Pentax, anyway, at the moment, right?).
And, while I'm quibbling (<g>), it would be nice if you carefully
distinguished properly between the Pentax lens lines: The 28/3.5
Shift ("pc"), the 500/4.5, and the 1000/11 are not "M Lenses", but
are SMC lenses (or "K" lenses"). (Because of this ambiguity, the
viewer cannot know if your inclusion of a 2000/13.5 is that of a K
lens or an M lens.) And, then there is that irreverent sprinkling
of FA lenses in the "A Lenses" list... ;-)
By the way, I apologize to any list members who might have been
offended by my use of the full, naked spelling of "Nikon", without
the use of asterisk fig leaves... ;-)
Fred
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
