Paul Stenquist wrote:

> This has been a minor obsession of mine. I know some list members have 
> shot hummingbirds. It’s definitely not impossible, although they rarely 
> stay in one place for more than a second. I don’t see a lot of the itty 
> bitty birds. But every once in a while a hummingbird will flit in among my 
> bee balm before disappearing. I’m usually focused on the tree branches 
> near my feeders, waiting for a finch, sparrow, chickadee or cardinal. By 
> the time I refocus to the bee balm, the hummer is gone. But not today. 
> Finally got one. Decent, not great. I’m intrigued by their speed and frail 
> bodies. They are obviously all muscle. The color isn’t beautiful, a subtle 
> green on the hummers I see, but it’s not awful. In any case, I got this 
> guy with the K-1, the DFA 150-450 and the 1.4X converter.630mm, f8, 
> 1/500th, ISO 2000. A workable set of numbers.
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18261742&size=lg

Nice! They're definitely difficult to photograph, given their
lightning-fast movement and the need for long glass. I once spent an
entire afternoon on the porch of our friend's cabin near GFM shooting
photos of the hummingbirds in their garden. I got 4 usable photos,
only two of which were really acceptable.

They people who are serious about hummingbird photography use 3 or 4
flash units but I've always preferred the look of natural light even
though is reduces your hit ration massively.

Check out this site:
http://www.dyesscreek.com/miscellaneous_pages/hummingbird_photography.html
 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.
  • Re: Hummmm Mark Roberts

Reply via email to