And he's misspelling it too.  Its y'all, y'all.  hehe

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Gonz <[email protected]> wrote:
> That is hilarious! And I chide Peter Ng for misappropriating Texan
> culture by the use of ya'll.  ;)
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Igor PDML-StR <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> This morning someone sent me a link to a brief blogpost on Cnet, which got
>> me (re)evaluating - (re)thinking certain aspects of photography in our
>> lives. The photo was of a crowd in front of a famous politician waving at
>> them, while most people turned their backs and taking selfies of themselves
>> with the famous people being the background.
>>  (The link is below, but first the thoughts.)
>>
>> Over many years of taking photographs, sometimes as tourist (i.e. in very
>> touristic places, etc.), - I've been offered by others (friends, relatives,
>> bystanders) to take a picture of _me_. ... or rather of _me__being__there_.
>> Not that I was against those (and sometimes I did want some picture,
>> especially with friends or family), but I was not particularly ego to get
>> those. I wanted to take some interesting (at least to me) of the views from
>> that place.
>> One of the repeated questions/comments I had (usually not from close friends
>> or relatives who already knew what I am after, but from more distant
>> friends): "Why do you need those? - See there, they sell cards with this
>> view already printed."
>>
>> Why was/am I taking those photos?
>> 1. I enjoy _taking_ them and
>> 2. I enjoy looking at them later, as they remind me of good time I had
>> there. And often, aftre many years, I remember the photos I've taken even
>> without looking at them: they are a connection for that place, person,
>> event. ... even though I might not be in those pictures myself.
>> (As an aside, - I appreciate the fact of being in some of those photos more
>> now, as my daughter is growing up, - so, that she can see her dad in those
>> photos too.)
>>
>> Now, getting back to the conclusion quoted in the Subject of this message.
>> Yes, selfie is the fad du jour [is that tautology?].
>> To this date, most of the selfies I've taken are with my SLR (with a tripod
>> or a mirror help). But I don't want to judge those people who enjoy selfies:
>> to each of his/her own. And to some extent, those people aren't that much
>> different from those stranger on the street who are ego to pose for you even
>> though they are never going to see that photo. (This was a very frequent
>> situation with kid groups in Japan.)
>>
>>
>> My understanding of the said blogpost is that someone is trying to question
>> of how polite it is to take a selfie with a famous person (and hence turning
>> one's behind to her/him) as opposed to piercing with your eyes and
>> listening.
>>
>> That brought to memories yet another story. Long time ago, one famous
>> Russian poet wrote a song that was "thinking" about a family being
>> photographed in front of the monument to the famous Russian poet Alexandr
>> Pushkin. The idea was based on the juxtaposition of the timelessness and
>> greatness of someone whose fame survived the test of centuries, and
>> "todayliness" of the concerns and that-minute problems of that family. I
>> remember that a friend was thinking that the author was criticizing the
>> family, and that that type of photo was awkward or even ridiculous due to
>> the contrast. While I understand that point of view (and I personally do not
>> like taking photographs of people (and myself) specifically with someone's
>> _personal_ monument), I never felt comfortable with that criticism. And I've
>> always thought that the song's author was just bringing up the contrast as a
>> way to highlight the simultaneous distance and closeness of the great and
>> small, old and contemporary, timeless and transient.
>>
>> But back to today's photo, here is what I am curious to hear from you, deal
>> PDMLers:
>> As photographers with different preferences, views and reasons to take
>> photographs, what do you think about what is shown in the photograph
>> discussed in that blogpost?
>> (Please, let's not digress into a political debate about the specific
>> politician, so, let's keep the political comments on mute.)
>>
>> Here is the blogpost in question: https://goo.gl/VC5fU3 .
>>
>> Thanks in advance to all who will respond.
>>
>> Igor
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
>
>
>
> --
> -- Reduce your Government Footprint



-- 
-- Reduce your Government Footprint

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to