Myriad reasons why it's ill suited. As you said you're introducing a lot of variables: projector, screen and more. Plus you'll have to shut down every time the K-1 reaches its video recording limit. Then you'll have to edit the breaks. Film transfer isn't very expensive. Find a good supplier and let them handle the job.
Paul via phone > On Nov 26, 2016, at 12:18 PM, Jos de Fotograaf <josdefotogr...@4prof.nl> > wrote: > > Maybe, Paul, > > The image quality will be limited by the quality of the projector lens, the > screen properties and the lens of the K1. > > The source films are with playing little children, cameraman with unsteady > hands and camera maybe with simple fixed focus lens. From what I have seen: > the original is not high technical quality anyhow. It is the emotional value > that I want to reproduce at a quality level not (much) lower than the > original. > > Could you indicate why the K1 is ill suited? > > >> On 25-Nov-16 22:25, Paul Stenquist wrote: >> But why remains a question. You can't duplicate the quality of film transfer >> by trying to shoot it with a dslr. >> >> Paul via phone >> >>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:19 PM, Jos de Fotograaf <josdefotogr...@4prof.nl> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Mike, you are right if the mechanical shutter would be used for >>> video, but I would expect the that The K1 uses the electronic shutter, is >>> that not the case? >>> >>> Greetz, Jos >>> >>> >>>> On 25-Nov-16 06:49, mike wilson wrote: >>>> Not so much ill-suited but for every minute of film you'll put about 1500 >>>> exposures on your shutter. An hour and a half's film would pretty much >>>> wear the >>>> camera out. >>>> >>>>> On 24 November 2016 at 21:17 Jos de Fotograaf <josdefotogr...@4prof.nl> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for your response, Paul. >>>>> >>>>> Could you plse indicate which properties (or lack of properties) make >>>>> the K1 ill suited for this task? >>>>> >>>>> I could hand the films over to a specialized company, but I enjoy so >>>>> much doing things myself :-) >>>>> >>>>> Greetz, Jos >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 24-Nov-16 14:08, Paul Stenquist wrote: >>>>>> No, it's not a good idea. A DSLR is ill suited to the task of movie film >>>>>> transfer. There are machines that transfer film quickly and efficiently, >>>>>> as >>>>>> well as hundreds of companies that offer the service. >>>>>> >>>>>> Paul via phone >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Nov 24, 2016, at 7:54 AM, Jos de Fotograaf <josdefotogr...@4prof.nl> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear group, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have this box with 50year old 8mm family films. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I want to digitize them for distribution to my children. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is it a good idea to use my K1 for this? Any experience? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Greetz, Jos >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
