Whoah. I never noticed that. Interesting. Their DR and noise performance is 100% identical from what I can tell. Maybe sony revised that sensor along the way.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:46 PM, P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote: > The K-3II either has a different sensor or slightly different sensor > masking, as it has a slightly higher pixel count. Not enough to, by itself, > make a "real world" difference in image quality, but it's not exactly the > same. Just very close in pretty much every respect. > > > > On 1/9/2017 10:49 AM, Zos Xavius wrote: >> >> The K-3 II has pixel shift, better SR (1 stop better), and the astro >> tracer built in. It also lacks a pop up flash since that is where they >> put the GPS unit. Otherwise they are 100% the same really. If you >> didn't need pixel shift or GPS I would just pass myself. >> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Collin B <coll...@brendemuehl.net> wrote: >>> >>> What's the advantages of a K3II over a K3? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
