I would be just as interesting if not more interesting to me to have the Bayer filter removed (is that even possible?). That would make for a cool B&W camera. don't know if the software would support this kind of image though (in raw).
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote: > I forgot to mention that the 28-105 is arguably the sharpest kit lens I've > ever used. I picked it up because I couldn't afford the 24-70, already had > a tammy 28-75, and didn't have a weather proof standard range zoom. > > In decent light, I'm quite happy to leave it on my camera. I don't know how > it compares, other than speed and cost with the 24-70. > > Also, when I got my K-1 I had a K-3 and a K-3II which made a nice pair for > when I wanted to use two bodies. I held off on selling one, but these days > only use one of them when I want to mount the 18-250 to have a small wide > range camera to carry around, I should do something with the K-3. One > option, and probably the smart one, would be to sell it. Another option > would be to have the IR block filter removed. > > This is a topic that comes up every now and then, and the list of shops > doing it seems to change on a year by year basis. Has anyone had the > conversion done lately? Who did it, are you happy with their work and what > did it cost? > > > > -- > Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- -- Reduce your Government Footprint -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
