All of my small bird photos are heavy crops. They have to be. I don't have a 
1200 mm lens. But I crop almost every photo, including those I shoot for 
publications. Sometimes it's just a sliver; at other times it's 25% of more of 
the frame. Being able to re-evaluate the frame in post is an advantage and an 
aesthetic necessity. The K-1 helps in that I have more pixels to play with. Not 
cropping is an artistic failure, IMO.

Paul via phone

> On Jan 24, 2017, at 6:02 PM, Steve Cottrell <co...@seeingeye.tv> wrote:
> 
> On 24/1/17, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
> 
>> Eric, everybody crops ...
> 
> Bruce has been known to crop so heavily that he's even had complaints
> from the PPA (Pixel Peeper's Association). Apparently there was a
> serious lack of pixels in some of his images, such that members were
> left in a 'confused and annoyed state'. That and they had trouble
> zooming in on the nipples.
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
>  Cotty
> 
> 
> ___/\__    Broadcast, Corporate,
> ||  (O)  |    Web Video Production
> ----------    <www.seeingeye.tv>
> _____________________________
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to