LMAO. I can see how the keys are next to each other and it thinks you want to say short for Kansas City.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > The KC is what happens when I try to type LX on my phone. It’s a typo. > >> On Mar 1, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Gonz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> What is the KC? Is it some kind of focus equipment? >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I've found the K-1 quite easy to focus manually, and my vision is no longer >>> good. I'll have to try it vs. the KC one of these days, but I think it will >>> compare favorably. Of course I haven't used my KC in 15 years, and my >>> memory might be failing me. >>> >>> Paul via phone >>> >>>> On Feb 28, 2017, at 7:49 PM, P. J. Alling <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I am of the opinion that a good manual focus screen is invaluable because >>>> AF just sucks under those circumstances. Too bad Pentax no longer makes a >>>> good manual focus screen. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2/28/2017 4:22 PM, Stanley Halpin wrote: >>>>>> On Feb 28, 2017, at 3:58 AM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> … I just went through the photos of one of the bands from this weekend, >>>>>> having shot a bit with the 80-200 on the K-3, with wider primes on the >>>>>> K-1 that night, and was reminded of just how well the K-3 can focus on >>>>>> microphones. >>>>>> >>>>> Common Mergansers swimming/fishing on the river by our house a couple of >>>>> days ago. I grabbed the K-1 + 70-200/2.8, carefully slipped outside and >>>>> did a few snappies without spooking them. Then I heard the unmistakable >>>>> sound of a Belted Kingfisher. Finally spotted it through a gap in the >>>>> bushes. I got a wonderful in focus shot of the bushes. If you knew what >>>>> to look for you could see the out of focus Kingfisher further back. >>>>> >>>>> Canon at one point had an AF mechanism based on the position/direction of >>>>> your eyeball as you looked through the viewfinder - a guy who worked for >>>>> me had one, was quite proud of owning such advanced technology. Which, he >>>>> admitted, didn’t work very well. But that notion needs to be revisited. >>>>> >>>>> stan >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>>> follow the directions. >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >> >> >> >> -- >> -- Reduce your Government Footprint >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- -- Reduce your Government Footprint -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
