Steven, Generally, I have no complaints about KEH. I just bought a Minolta CLE in "bargain" condition. The sole reason for that rating was that the hot shoe was shorted out. Otherwise the camera is in "mint" condition. As far as lenses go, I have bought a Pentax F135/2.8 that was perfect optically, with a few rub marks and a scratched plastic scale window. No problems otherwise. I also bought a Leica 90 Elmarit in "Exel+ condition which I had to return because of serious coating marks...They sent me another one right away that was fine, with profuse appologies. I don't think you can go wrong with KEH. I think they take "customer satisfaction" seriously. Regards, Bob --- steven gilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have seen a couple of posts here from people > commenting that KEH bargain condition equipment is > generally in good condition. My question is whether > anyone has purchesed bargain lenses that were either > optically defective or in less than fully functional > mechanical condition. > > I am not a collector, and do not care what my gear > looks like cosmetically. But as a user I do require > clean optics and smooth focus and aperature rings. > Will I be satisfied? > -- > _______________________________________________ > Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at > Email.com > http://www.email.com/?sr=signup > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. > To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. > Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at > http://pug.komkon.org . >
===== What boots up must come down. LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
