Shel Belinkoff wrote: > My comment wasn't intended to start an argument or debate about zooms v > primes. It was a rhetorical question and an offhand way to suggest that > a faster prime might be a better alternative than a slower zoom in > Maris's situation. > > Perhaps I should have phrased my comment differently, although it's > always nice to read some of the comments on either side of the issue > while enjoying my morning tea or coffee. Far better than Doonsbury or > Dilbert <g>.
And I would rather eat a whole package of Ex-Lax for breakfast than see another debate over whether primes or zooms are better. :) Bob - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
