I like shooting with a film camera too on occasion, have several with
film in them, but this is to a film camera what a baby alligator is to a
On 10/10/2017 8:12 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Brian Walters wrote:
On 11 October 2017 at 09:48 "Daniel J.
Seems rather stupid to me.
Yeah - Yashica made some fine cameras back in the day. Now someone
the rights to the name and is set on making it a laughing stock. Or
maybe I'm a
bit too old to appreciate this camera's coolness...
It will open up a market for artisanal hand crafted pixels.
It's interesting how in the video the same woman is both ostensibly
the photographer and also the model. I really expected to see a guy
with a hipster beard and a fixie bike. At least she had the hipster
The video did have the crappy artsy color balance. I noticed how it
was all about the experience and not the image quality. I will note
that the canisters do make the settings easier, since you can't worry
about ISO etc. you don't have to worry about them. And there is a
precedent for the lack of a screen, doesn't Leica do that on one of
their cameras? They could advertise the same rear screen as a Leica
that costs several times as much. I wonder what the point of the
winder is? I guess just to replicate the film experience.
Snark aside, I have noticed that in many ways I much prefer the
experience of shooting with a film camera. Photographing with my Argus
is an entirely different experience than with my DSLRs. I haven't run
a roll through a film SLR in ages, but being forced to think about
everything in advance, and whether each press of the shutter is worth
$1 does change the experience. Be that as it may, there are many
reasons that I shoot digital and haven't gone back to film.
America wasn't founded so that we could all be better.
America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please.
- P.J. O'Rourke
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow