Reuters is probably more sensitive since they've already been burned a couple 
of times in the 2006 Lebanon War.

On 10/12/2017 19:37, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I see some leaping to conclusions here, but it's not important. I know I 
wouldn't risk faking a photo for the Times. They would pull my credentials 
permanently if I were caught. Don't know what Reuters policy is, but I would 
think it's similar. Of course that doesn't mean someone wouldn't make the 
attempt for a good payday.

Paul via phone

On Oct 12, 2017, at 6:27 PM, ann sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:

Well I did kinda live there for a while so had some advantage

ann

On 10/12/2017 6:14 PM, mike wilson wrote:
On the nail.  The runway is on the same side as the photo was taken so the plane
should be much larger.  Naughty Reuters.

On 12 October 2017 at 21:59 ann sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:


The plane could not be at that altitude and going -up- in that direction
given where the hotel is and the airport is.. may be more wrong than
that..  but it is surely a photoshop paste job.

ann

On 10/12/2017 4:18 PM, mike wilson wrote:
What's wrong with this Reuter's pic?

https://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/8A4C/production/_98140453_hi042190292.jpg


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.



--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to