I see some leaping to conclusions here, but it's not important. I know I
wouldn't risk faking a photo for the Times. They would pull my credentials
permanently if I were caught. Don't know what Reuters policy is, but I would
think it's similar. Of course that doesn't mean someone wouldn't make the
attempt for a good payday.
Paul via phone
> On Oct 12, 2017, at 6:27 PM, ann sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> Well I did kinda live there for a while so had some advantage
>> On 10/12/2017 6:14 PM, mike wilson wrote:
>> On the nail. The runway is on the same side as the photo was taken so the
>> should be much larger. Naughty Reuters.
>>> On 12 October 2017 at 21:59 ann sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>>> The plane could not be at that altitude and going -up- in that direction
>>> given where the hotel is and the airport is.. may be more wrong than
>>> that.. but it is surely a photoshop paste job.
>>>> On 10/12/2017 4:18 PM, mike wilson wrote:
>>>> What's wrong with this Reuter's pic?
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>> the directions.
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
> the directions.
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow