I see some leaping to conclusions here, but it's not important. I know I wouldn't risk faking a photo for the Times. They would pull my credentials permanently if I were caught. Don't know what Reuters policy is, but I would think it's similar. Of course that doesn't mean someone wouldn't make the attempt for a good payday.
Paul via phone > On Oct 12, 2017, at 6:27 PM, ann sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> wrote: > > Well I did kinda live there for a while so had some advantage > > ann > >> On 10/12/2017 6:14 PM, mike wilson wrote: >> On the nail. The runway is on the same side as the photo was taken so the >> plane >> should be much larger. Naughty Reuters. >> >>> On 12 October 2017 at 21:59 ann sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> The plane could not be at that altitude and going -up- in that direction >>> given where the hotel is and the airport is.. may be more wrong than >>> that.. but it is surely a photoshop paste job. >>> >>> ann >>> >>>> On 10/12/2017 4:18 PM, mike wilson wrote: >>>> What's wrong with this Reuter's pic? >>>> >>>> https://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/8A4C/production/_98140453_hi042190292.jpg >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow >>> the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
